Archive
Tag "facebook"

A lady’s secret weapon of choice? The almighty bitchface. Bring it. (Rookie)

Tavi writes about first encounters with feminine objectification for her new online magazine. (Rookie)

It’s hard to imagine a blogosphere without the voices of the many women who’ve made 21st century feminism what it is today. This means you! Take a stroll down memory lane with this chronology of feminist blogging, and also check out the must-read list of the ultimate feminist blogs for some conscious-raising web surfing. (NY Magazine)

Perhaps more important, these sites inspired an even sharper cadre of commenters, who bonded and argued, sometimes didactically, sometimes cruelly, but just as often pushing one another to hone their ideas—all this from a generation of women written off in the media as uninterested in any form of gender analysis, let alone the label “feminist.” Freed from the boundaries of print, writers could blur the lines between formal and casual writing; between a call to arms, a confession, and a stand-up routine—and this new looseness of form in turn emboldened readers to join in, to take risks in the safety of the shared spotlight.

Pandagon, one of the web’s very first feminist blogs, has some nice things to say about the article too. (Pandagon)

The always articulate Meg is bang on point with her analysis of web-based ‘lady-snark’ against Kreayshawn and Lana Del Ray. (Good Morning Midnight)

Lana Del Ray

…the necessary performativity of sex appeal in the feminine, and the fact that feminine sex appeal is essentially defined by performativity, artifice, and decoration.  Personally, I’m fine with Del Rey’s big hair, pouty face, winged eyeliner, lipgloss, and staged nostalgia-sexy photos: I do the same thing on a lesser level every day when I tame the wild-haired bleary-eyed stubble-legged beast who wakes up in my bed into the groomed, coiffed, red-lipped vanilla-scented thing I am when I show up to the office by 10.  This is all part of an elaborate joke I’m playing on you where you think my eyes are actually this big and my skin this even, where you think I just roll out of bed dressed this nice.

Every now and then, I fall in love with someone on the internet. This is one of those such ocassions. Tati Kalveks is an 18-year-old British singer/song-writer with a sassy repetoire to rival the likes of Kate Nash and Lilly Allen combined. Meow-rouser!

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvnblcywa04]
Sick and tired of all the rape jokes on Facebook? You’re not the only one! A dislike of epic proportions! (Ms. Magazine)

What’s it like to be a woman working in film behind the camera? Frustrating, says Mariella Frostrup. (The Guardian)

Did you like my post about Tumblr and street style? I’m not the only one who’s skeptical of street fashion blogs. (Jezebel)

Read More

….And thus concludes the end of my second week back at uni. Was I ready for this jelly? No, no I was not. Regardless, you’re more than likely to find me bouncing out of bed ready to LEARN IMPORTANT STUFF rather than clutching at my pillow, praying for JUST 5 MORE MINUTES PLZ. I love learning, and I’m so happy to be back at uni. It’s the ultimate indulgence to feed my mind, to bounce ideas off of other inspiring, positive and creative people.

Things might be a little more quiet now that I’m back at big school and writing essays and trying to remember how to use the APA referencing system (which I totally don’t remember existed, by the way). I wish I had more time to jump up and down on my computer keyboard excitedly and churn out more posts like the eager Gen Y smarty-pants I am, but my course requires a lot of attention and little time for…well, life. Having said that,I’m really determined to make time for the projects that matter to me these days. More writing! More photography! More reading! Like a grocery list chock block of awesome food for the soul! Time is trickier than Where’s Wally. You can’t find it, you have to make it, and you’re never too busy for the things you love. Never.


This week I definitely noticed a trend in articles on self-loathing and self-loving in the physical sense. Because Girls Are Made From Pepsi is all about lady love, coming to terms with and accepting our diverse physicality is a large part of appreciating and celebrating your foxy self. Females of all ages – whether young girls or middle aged women – have all gone through some sort of body image crisis. Some deal with their inner critics more effectively than others, whilst some of still unconsciously grab at imaginary love-handles when trying on new jeans. I personally don’t feel ready to write a body image post of my own, so below are some of the best I’ve read this week (or ever!).

How gay-friendly is Facebook? With the Google+ machine ploughing through the digital stratosphere aiming to catch as many band-wagon enthusiasts as possible (oh yeah, I saw it riding past and climbed on!), Lesbilicious takes a look at how the world’s most popular (and infamous!) social networking site helped (or hindered) queer visability. Can we expect the same from Google+? Do social networks force people out of the closet when they ask you disclose information? Or is it still possible to keep some of our life private? It did not escape me that Google+ does not ask for your sexual orientation…

By the way – it’s awfully lonely on Google+! If anyone wants an invite, holla at me! I’m willing to spread the love around!

Liz at Autostraddle does a fashioncap of the latest Pretty Little Liars, turns the majority of the cast/extras into homos, and consequently makes my week whilst doing so.

THIS IS NEW INFORMATION. Not all women like pink. If you are one of those women, I’m sorry for my blog’s colour scheme and it’s affect on your retinas. Not really, because I love pink! But don’t worry, I still like you. This study, published in the Harvard Business Review (and handily dissected for the sake of my poor attention span by Gawker), suggests that women don’t like pink because it reminds them of other women.

Despite the fact that a full 100% of lesbians are women, it appears that women do not actually love themselves? Because it’s not the color of pink that women hate, according to the study, so much as the fact that pink is “a gender cue” that triggers a “defensive response” among women. This sort of self-loathing behavior is really sad to see among a gender that has produced lots of really quality gymnasts.

The study was conducted in relation to breast cancer donations. Although it seems fairly obvious that sometimes, you know, women prefer blue, some parts of the study actually sounded like they might not be completed baseless.

We put breast cancer banner ads on a website we showed the subjects but never mentioned them. When the site was geared to women [with the colour pink], 33% of women recalled the ads. When it was gender-neutral, 65% remembered. It’s been three years, and we have duplicated the same basic finding 10 times. It keeps happening.

Check out this video for Vanessa Bruno’s SS 12 collection. It features a Lou Doillon and Jessica Joffe as beautifully dressed forest sprites of some sort. (I am still recovering from Stevie Dance’s departure. I feel the need to talk about this. Anyone?)

140 characters can say a lot about your gender. According to a sociolinguistic study, women use a lot more emoticons and exclamation points ( !! =] ). I think I may have been an unwitting subject for this study…

Girl With a Satchel (Erica Bartle, or GWAS as she is known) is talking about body image. It’s a regular topic on GWAS, but I always love her posts on body image because they’re not just empty, superficial rhetoric about how important it is for us to love ourselves. Erica’s past experiences inform her views on body image and the media, so it’s not like she comes across all gung-ho about fighting the evil advertising standards which allow women to look like pore-less faces of sparkling beauty. She just recognises that it really, really sucks to open up a magazine and not feel like you resemble the yummy young things that dominate the pages.

What can be done by publishers in light of the fact that the Voluntary Code of Conduct has not been widely accepted? Go easy on the Photoshop, embrace what’s real, and complement fashion and beauty with a greater proportion of content that gives credit to women and girls’ other attributes. Devote sections to cultivating their minds, creativity, social conscience, resilience and knowledge of the world, as well as playing on their capacity to empathise, laugh, have fun and contribute something positive.

Source: weheartit.com

Rachel Hills shares her personal experience of BDD (body dysmorphic disorder).

When you’re actually living through something, it feels like some dark, impossible shame you could never speak openly to anyone about. Then there’s the stage of recovery where the whole event seems far enough in the past that the stigma begins to evaporate and you can speak about it freely. And eventually, you get to the point where it seems so long ago that it no longer feels relevant, almost as if it happened to another person.

I think I feel a bit like Rachel in a way when she says she finds it hard to open up, and not because she’s ashamed or doesn’t want to relive past events she’d rather keep locked up in her 16-year-old diary, but because it’s had to relate to who we were in the past. How do you speak for someone who exists outside of your here and now? Just as it’s difficult to comprehend and interpret another person’s state of mind, so too is it problematic to try and justify the actions of your former self. I, like many other girls, feel so far removed from who we once were, and that’s why many things are left unsaid.

Conversely, Anna Sussman writes of the eating disorder cliche – ‘Me Too’ Syndrome. I would really love to hear everyone’s thoughts on this one! Do you think there’s an E.D cliche? Or are you more partial to an open book policy? Over sharing? Or over people not caring?

Your vagina is a beautiful flower and anyone who gets your naked as hit the jackpot. Nay to vulva antagonism!

gucci gucci louis louis fendi fendi prada

Look familiar?

Apple, Pear, or Eggplant? I never understood why people compare their bodies with the shapes of fruit. I get the need to associate the female form with a deliciously sweet snack, but I’ve never felt these so called guides to female body shapes ever achieve anything.

Not satisfied? You might have more luck with something like Trinny & Susannah’s body shape guide, which has 12 possible forms—but, if you’re like me, you’ll still be left untyped. This isn’t because of your crazy, freakish body type that is unfit to be clothed. It’s because your body is probably a combination of run-of-the-mill (I mean that with love!) without a particular feature that calls for attention, and certain features that you may want to highlight or conceal but that don’t land you in one of the classic types.

Share

Read More

For your reading pleasure!

Prozac Nation in the 21st Century – This particular story from The Guardian really hit home for me. With one in three women reliant upon anti-depressants to get out of bed, I feel this article says what so many other people, let alone women, have wanted to say. I never used to be open about my mental health, but these days I’m taking the honesty route. Having been on anti-depressants since I was 12 (yes, even before I hit the troublesome teen years) I was officially diagnosed with depression, and promptly put on Cipramil. I’ve been on and off SSRIs for 11 years, and am gradually starting to ween myself off. The thing is with anti-depressants, you become rather attached to them. They become a part of your body, like an arm or a leg or a treasured birth mark or secret mole. If you want the god honest truth, I don’t think I should have ever been put on them. I’m 23-years-old, and I rely on the highest legal dosage of Cipramil to keep me from hybernating. Whilst I have the luxury of being able to work through my issues on a cognitive level (whatever these ‘issues’ may be, I’m not sure. Sometimes I feel I have a natural predilection for unsubstantiated melancholy), I understand that some people just want to put their black dog to sleep, post haste. It’s so much easier to cover up your demons than trying to train your black dog. (The Guardian)

The doctor was right all those years ago when he told me to consider coming off them because “life gets harder, not easier”. But to sit and talk about depression when there’s so much else to do … children to raise, husbands to harass, homes to run, careers to cultivate, never mind a life to live… well, I’ve got a three-second window in between school drop-off, cleaning the toilet and sleep, so is 2.35am OK for a chat, counsellor? The invitation to “talk with tissues” also rather negates the widely-held scientific understanding of the chemical relationship between serotonin and depression. You wouldn’t tell a diabetic: “there, there, let it all out and forget the insulin”.

What all of us female glossy addicts/pioneers for fierce bitches are hoping for – an autobiography by Anna Wintour. Does she really play tennis every morning? Did she really demand a staffer to purchase an unpublished manuscript of Harry Potter? Does she shave, or does she wax? Is she dressed by bluebirds in the morning? Will she shoot lazer beams out of her eyes when she removes her glasses? (Fashionista)

Lady Gaga’s wishful thinking – Julia is a sapphic sister. (Lesbilicious)

The preservation of the self online - Erica Bartle asks ‘should we encourage young girls to create a public persona’? Social media now the photo albums of yesteryear, and with last night’s party on display for mothers, employers and exes to see, it’s pretty obvious we need to practice some precaution. But how much precaution? In interview with the Sydney Morning Herald, brand manager Sharon Williams suggests that not only should young girls self-censor, they should also develop a public persona. A brand identity of sorts.

”It’s like a tattoo,” Ms Williams, of Artarmon, said. “Parents need to take control and be responsible for their personal brand because as a child, you have no idea that in 15 years’ time or five years’ time, the effects of what you’re doing today will be wide-ranging and have the most extraordinary repercussions.”

However, Erica suggests internet fame is just another way for girls to compete with one another. (GWAS)

There’s a distinction between guidelines and “branding”, the latter connoting a deliberate imagining and projecting of one’s ideal image at a time when that image is in development and vulnerable to external influences. In the process of grappling with the public/private self dichotomy, I imagine many teens could become quite confused in the process. It’s exhausting keeping up appearances, let alone two or more of them! But the last word goes to Eugenie: “Perhaps we need a reminder that not all of us are destined for fame. Or as Mother would say, sometimes a little mystery isn’t such a bad thing.”

 Gertrude Stein gets her iPhone. Incomprehensible modernist poetry follows.

Beauty or brains? Scarlet over at Early Bird Catches the Worm asks which we would rather have, as well as which we would rather be known for. Whilst most people view the two as mutually exclusive, I think we can have both. Why not? (Early Bird Catches the Worm)

DREAM NERDBURGER

For a 15-year-old, Tavi sure is wise. I wish I was cool at 15. Heck, I wish I were this cool now! In this post she talks about beauty privilege, and how to undermine it without coming across as a complete jerk. (Style Rookie)

The general voice of my blog has been very much against the idea of those (or, in a way, any) standards for a long time, maybe not in so many words, but definitely in sprit. I once relished in an email I got saying I was an ugly boy because it felt like proof that I hadn’t given in to societal pressure to be pretty that girls usually feel affected by. I got all self reflecty on Tumblr about creating my own ideas of beauty. I wrote simply during September’s No Makeup Week that I never felt the urge to wear any. I used to dress much more frumpily and goofily, on here and in public real life. Which was great, and I loved it. But, as is the point of this blog, my style has changed a bit.

I would be lying to say it ends at simply wanting to try a different aesthetic of dressing, though. With one’s freshman year of high school comes a new batch of insecurities and a new kind of self-awareness. Except…I would be lying to say it ends there, too, because I know I’m smarter than that, and I know I have a good bullshit filter when it comes to conformity pressure in high school and women’s magazines and men’s magazines and industries that thrive on their female demographics’ insecurities.

Harry Potter and the girls who weren’t the chosen ones. Because the final Harry Potter came out this week, I couldn’t resist digging around for some old articles regarding the super girls in Harry Potter. Most of the feminist readings about Harry Potter lambast J.K Rowling as anti-feminist. Like, why is Harry not Harriet? Why is Dumbledore head master and not Professor McGonagal (never mind that he is replaced by Umbridge). Why are wands so phallic? Why don’t they wave around flowers? Why does patriarchy extend to the wizarding world?! Not so, says this article from Bitch magazine.

Hermione Granger is Rowling’s feminist presence in the novel, of course. We’re continually hit over the head with how clever she is, and it’s Hermione’s intelligent thinking that so often saves the day. Hermione is always guided by a strong set of ethics: She cares about social justice, as particularly embodied in her commitment to house elf rights where most of the wizarding world wouldn’t think twice about their status. She nurses a passion for Ron, her best friend with Harry, but never loses her dignity for it. (Her “Just because you’ve got the emotional range of a teaspoon doesn’t mean we all have” line will never lose its punch.) And she’s brave. Hermione has a fierce kind of commitment to the fight for peace and justice running through the series, even when that means modifying her parents’ memories and sending them to Australia so they will be safe. She made it cool to be smart and forthright for a lot of girls.

BAM.


Read More

This week’s round-up of productive procrastination! Random tidbits, tasty morsels for the bored, food for the soul and social commentary.

Skechers is sexist and hates cupcakes – Uh, wow. This advertisement is all kinds of creepy. Don’t run from cupcakes, girls!. But maybe run away from a Candy BBQ.

Sistah be doin’ it for sistahood! Kristin Wiig has a new movie coming out, and it’s your duty as a 21st Century grrrl to go see it!

Speaking of female comedians, growing up, I was never a fan of the Roseanne show. Most of the jokes flew over my head and my father was king of the remote control anyways and the show wasn’t to his liking. Now I’m 23 (almost!), I possess the cynicism that one can only acquire with age, and now I kind of appreciate the wise-ass parents and the wise-ass kids. Roseanne wears flannel, she over-eats, makes fun of her children behind their backs and has this absurd love/hate relationship with her mother and sister. Roseanne really reveals how imperfect modern families are – and it’s hilarious! Love her or hate her, Roseanne Barr changed the comedy industry for women. But she had to play hard ball to do it.

It didn’t take long for me to get a taste of the staggering sexism and class bigotry that would make the first season of Roseanne god-awful. It was at the premiere party when I learned that my stories and ideas—and the ideas of my sister and my first husband, Bill—had been stolen. The pilot was screened, and I saw the opening credits for the first time, which included this: CREATED BY MATT WILLIAMS. I was devastated and felt so betrayed that I stood up and left the party. Not one person noticed.

Facebook in real life - Bright star Natalia (hola, girl!) over at Mamma Mia bought my attention to the Hungry Beast’s video. It’s about how Facebook’s codes of social etiquette fail to apply to real life situations. It’s funny, and I get the point they’re making. Why on earth are we broadcasting to the world that we’re drinking a slurpy? Or that we’re gay, or straight, or our favourite movie is fightclub, or our email server of choice? But the interwebs is not real life. And that’s what makes it so fun, and at times a little scary.

Which brings me to this post by Rachel Hills about the ‘”Ga-Ga-esque pyrotechnics” of the internet.

Sometimes the grubbiness runs deeper. A sense that what some people are saying, at least, is all bullshit; jostling; self-aggrandising. A product of a hope on their part that if you say something often enough, it will become true.

Part of the problem is what Mills touches upon in his post: the fact that social media is a public space. A more public space than the places we used to think of as public spaces, even. When it comes to social media, almost everything happens “on stage”. Even something like Facebook, which drew its initial appeal from the promise that it was a walled online garden where we could freely be ourselves, has long since become anything but that.

More privacy drama surrounding Facebook. The Sydney Morning Herald describes it as “‘men’s only” Facebook group” which “features hundreds of images of women in bikinis and lingerie, obtained from the personal Facebook photo albums of the members’ female friends”. One of the girls’ whose photos were uploaded without her consent said – “I’m a little bit angry, to be honest. If it was one of my friends who has copied a photo of me to put on a public website and not let me know then I’d feel extremely betrayed.” Unfortunately, there aren’t any laws at the moment outlawing the sharing of images from social media websites. I’m speculating that the owners of the Brocial Network will probably retaliate with a backlash against these women, who probably shouldn’t post these images because they’re all just asking for attention and should be flattered by their manliness and overwhelmingly mature response to the female form, right? I have photos on my facebook of myself in a bikini. I don’t post them for attention, or so all the boyz will lyk me and think I’m hawt. I think the Brocial Network is just another form of ‘slut-shaming’, and a means to ingrain this idea that female bodies are public property.

In defense of hipsters – I like bikes. Old bikes. I hate Ikea. I enjoy wearing ugly jumpers and some of the so called music I like is more akin to an orgy of broken computers. Does this make me a hipster? Maybe. But I also like Usher! And television! And sometimes I get my coffee from Gloria Jeans! Hipster-dom is starting to define my generation. That is, my generation is defining themselves with stuff from past generations. A disdain for capitalism and mass-manufacturing. Vintage furniture. Mustaches. Granny’s cardigans. Obscure music. Obscure type-faces. Obscure anything, really. But what exactly is so wrong with widening your tastes and exploring other than what is right in front of you?

The aesthetic is about being appreciative of things that have been made with care and consideration, like beautiful bikes and hand-crafted fonts. Not to take the piss or because they can’t think of anything new themselves, but because they appreciate things that were done well…in contrast to the mass-produced gunk they grew up around. Hipster culture cherry-picks the best of the new and the old.

The Emotional Guidance System – Sometimes, I feel like my days are ruled by polar opposite emotions. I feel either jubilant, or severely bed-ridden with pessimism and a severe case of Angry Princess Bitchface. I’m walking on sunshine or having an inner monologue about hating everyone and everything, including myself. Jetta’s post over at The Radical Uprise really helped me visual my emotions on the scale. She talks about Jerry and Esther Hick’s Emotional Guidance System, which kind of entails you to see your emotions as a kind of ladder. You gotta work up that thing if you wanna get to the top, sugar. I usually describe my moods as shit, less shit, pretty good and super-fucking great thank you sir, but this way’s a lot better.

Bin it, baby – As a reformed hoarder and an obsessive chucker-outerer (yes I made that word up. Copyright Camilla Peffer 2011 etc), I never shy away from preaching the benefits of simplistic living. When I moved to Perth a month ago, I was living out of a suitcase for three weeks. It’s surprising how much you can get by without. I really did have an urge to watch 500 Days of Summer so not having my DVD collection kind of sucked, but the quality of my life wasn’t exactly lacking or anything without it. When all my stuff arrived (one week late I might add!), I found myself listing a whole heap of unwanted clothes on eBay. Not sure why I ever had that puffy-sleeved gold Michael Jackson jacket.

How the Bachelor in Bugger All can help you get ahead – Whilst applying to universities this week (I got into Murdoch! Yay! But I really have my fingers crossed for Curtin!), I needed a reminder of why I’m putting myself through three years of caffeine induced brainstorming, midnight essays and often times cold, distant institutionalised learning. Does my distinction average really count for anything? Could I be doing something more? Sarah Von over at Yes and Yes says it’s all about the extra that provide the extra icing on your resume cake.

More than your degree, your work experience, personality, connections and work ethic will help you find a job. If you’ve got a few good internships, knowledge of the appropriate software, a friendly demeanor and a buddy in the company, it probably won’t matter if your degree is in underwater basket weaving – you’ll be in.

Who hasn’t worked a crummy job before? Who isn’t working a crummy job right now? The next time I take on a bottom rung position and find myself ordered to decorate bathrooms again, I’m going to remind myself of Melissa Febos’ story. We all start out somewhere as a worm beneath the dirt, so we may as well create some crazy anecdotes to impress aquaintances!

Read More

Most of my job as a reporter at UNSW’s student magazine Blitz involves providing some shining pearls of wisdom for the student body. Here’s an article I wrote on computers in classrooms after I realised doodling in the margins is really no different to Facebook status updates. Both are great ways to fight boredom! Become a martyr today!


Look around you. What are people doing? Are you in class? Take a look at your lecturer. Now, take a look at the people around you. What are they doing? Do they appear enraptured, eagerly transcribing the pearls of wisdom which flow from the figure on the podium? Or are they tap-tap-tapping away at the heaving slabs (or impossibly thin compacts) of plastic in their laps, occasionally sharing a secret smile with the screens of their computers? Can you tell who’s more engaged with what’s displayed on the projector below? Here’s a clue: it’s not the guy singing along to Chocolate Rain.

Now, imagine your lecturer strips the classroom of all personal computers. Feeling a little naked and vulnerable, aren’t we?

Examining a lecture hall today reveals about half of students now transcribing lecture notes via computer, and probably even more so inside certain faculties, such as Law. Lecture recordings, lectures slides, extra readings, and sometimes entire courses are now taught online. So it makes sense to chuck out the archaic spiral note-pads of yore and give note-taking a 21st Century makeover too, no? Whilst it’s a blessing for those whose cursive resembles chicken scratchings, some academics warn of it’s counter-productiveness. A video clip of an enraged professor from the University of Oklahoma pouring liquid nitrogen on a student’s laptop received drew a million hits on Youtube – demonstrating just how strongly some lecturers feel about technology in the class room. But why?

“The screen acts as a barrier,” explains Robert McMurtrie, a tutor in Media here at UNSW. “It’s an engagement thing. With computer screens in class, students don’t engage in tutorials or lecturers.”

A survey done at ? university revealed the marks of those who brought their computers to class was on par with those who failed to show up at all. Yikes.

Kim, 21, is in her fourth year of her Bachelor of Arts (Education) degree and takes down lecture notes on her laptop. “My mind really drifts though,” she says. “I got to Facebook and Gmail, but I also use Wikipedia to look up something the lecturer’s said that I don’t understand. I probably take notes 75 per cent of the time.”

And what of those who believe the pen is mightier? Well, there’s the issue of not having to lug around an extra kilo or two, and besides, it’s highly unlikely anyone will steal a notepad and pen.

So to come to class (technologically) stripped, or to become a fully-fledged member of the technoratti? Consider the following

FOR COMPUTERS:

Lecturers sometimes speak in jibberish (read – showing off their advanced Phd vocabulary). Don’t understand what polythetic means? Fire up the Google machine! Mission accomplished.

In the midst of scrambling out of bed on time, you forgot your assignment. Woop-de-doo – print it off at one of the three P3 services on campus. Crisis averted!

You are bored. This lecture sucks. You need to ask Kimberley if she feels as equally brain-dead, but she’s sitting across the room. Hello, MSN! Where have you been all my life?

Your handwriting bares more of a resemblance to hieroglyphics than the English language, so typing is way more practical when it comes to exam revision.

AGAINST COMPUTERS:

Not only is a word-processing program at your fingertips, you’ve also got access to a world of shopping, multiple TV stations, radio programs and an agricultural business (thank you, Farmville). You’ve got a whole smorgasboard of distra – oh look! There’s a bird!

You’re a target for theft. Not only will you have to carry around an extra kilo or two, you’ll have to arm yourself with mace or nun-chucks in order to protect yourself from technology pirates.

Practice makes perfect, and whilst you’re tap-tap-tapping away, you’re cursive is being smothered by your typing wpm. Which means your arm is going to require some intensive CPR come exam time.

Read More